You’ve probably already figured out
that I’m a grammar nerd. How could I not be? I’m a copy editor, and just by
virtue of the job alone, I’m pretty persnickety about spelling and punctuation
and how words go together. In addition, I was raised by woman who respected
language and words. She taught me to love words and that using them correctly
makes you a better person. I think that’s true, mostly, and I do love language
and learning new words.
But here’s the thing. English is
tough—ask anyone for whom it is their second language—it’s hard to learn
because so many words sound the same, but are spelled differently and mean
entirely different things—their, they’re,
and there, for example. Your and you’re. Here and hear. They’re called homophones and are
different from homographs, which are words that are spelled the same, but sound
different and have different meanings. Bass
(the fish) and bass (a low deep
sound). Lead (the metal) and lead (to go in front of). And just
because it’s English and we can—sometimes homophones and homographs are all
referred to as homonyms. G.K.
Chesterton once said, “The word ‘good’ has many meanings. For example, if a man
were to shoot his grandmother at a range of five hundred yards, I should call
him a good shot, but not necessarily
a good man.”
We set rules in English and then
always, always break them. The one about it’s
and its is one of my favorites and
something that I fix in other people’s manuscripts all the time. Think about
it.(Tee hee!) The rule about forming possessives is to add an apostrophe and
and s or sometimes in the case of plural nouns just an apostrophe. (Of course
there are exceptions to the plural possessive thing too, which can really make
my eye twitch, so we won’t go into those.) But it’s and its breaks the
possessive rule because the conjunction rule takes precedence. So it’s is the conjunctive form of it is
and its is the possessive of it. Go figure.
Then there’s the whole whom versus who thing. Ye gods! The rule is that whom is an object pronoun, while whom is a subject pronoun. Sure, why not? (I can see you rolling
your eyes!) So here’s an easy way to remember which one to use. Simply replace
the who or whom with he or she or him or her. If he or she works, use who; if him or her works, then it’s whom. Example: Who did you call? I called him. So, it should be Whom did you call. Make sense?
A lot of editors don’t do this, but
when I do a copyedit and I change something that the author has consistently
gotten wrong, I put in a note of explanation, either that a misspelled word is
corrected per Merriam Webster’s 11th
Collegiate Dictionary, or if it’s a grammar thing, I explain the rule and
cite it in The Chicago Manual of Style—now
in its sixteenth edition. It’s a teaching thing and I hope makes them better
writers, plus it also lets them know, I’m not just arbitrarily messing with
their work. By the way, if you’re a writer and you don’t own those two
reference books, get thee immediately to a bookstore and buy them. They’re
essential.
So, the editor could certainly talk
grammar endlessly, but I’m going to stop here. Maybe next time I get into a
grammar nerd mood, we’ll talk punctuation. Oxford commas, anyone? Oy!
The older I get, the more confusing grammar gets for me--when I'm writing. However, the older I get, the more grateful I am when good grammar is observed--when I'm reading. Thank goodness for editors.
ReplyDeleteFunny how that works, huh, Liz? I'm so grateful that language is my gift--I love being an editor! So thanks!! ;-)
Deletegreat tips, Nan!! The its/it's thing *always* gets me. And were/was - I know that one is simple, but it sounds so wrong to say/write it 'right' that...yeah..
ReplyDeleteHey, Kristina--well, I figure what's the use of having an editor in the house if she can't sometimes give advice. So I think I'll probably throw one of these in every so often...they could be helpful to other writers, too. I'll tackle were/was next time, okay?
Delete*claps* sounds good to me!
DeleteOkay, if you've never watched Brian Regan's school clip, you definitely should. In fact, I have been known to quote it when I need to remember the I before E rule. And it is hilarious!
ReplyDeleteAnd it is very hard for me to read texts or FB posts where the person uses U for You or mix up the there, their, they're. Although it's and its gets me every time.